Metering | Scoins.net | DJS

Metering

This connects with essay 243, which is about smart meters for gas and electricity. If you don’t have one of these where you live, the meters output information to a hub, probably on the top of the new electricity meter, which then sends information off to the billing supplier at appropriate intervals. Included in each installation is an in-home device (IHD) which stores and outputs data to the user. Typical such devices give historic data by the day and by energy meter (gas, electricity, combined) both in money and in kWh.

My questions frequently ask you to make a conclusion about your answer. This is what arithmetic should do, inform an opinion. So I am asking you to express opinions once you find an answer. It is difficult for someone to say you are wrong in your opinion unless you misunderstand the number you produced; this should provide interesting class discussion of the sort that makes the subject feel worthwhile. I have also left room for different interpretations of what you could do with the numbers; do what you think is appropriate at the time.


1. On arrival downstairs in the winter, sufficiently early to beat the clock on the gas heating system, I see that the IHD records we have already spent 60p on energy today. What do you think this money represents? The 60p is made up of 34p electricity and 26p gas.
The IHD includes what is called the standing charge, which is £84 for electricity and £73 for gas. If the gas has not yet been used, how much used electricity is included above? In your house/room, what would that refer to? 

2. I intend to boil the kettle. How much energy do I expect to use in boiling a half litre? Assume tap water temperature is 10º and that water requires 4184J per kg per degree C. If my kettle is rated at 2000W, how long do I expect this to take? Do you see anything wrong with this?

3. On another occasion I boil water in 70 seconds using a 3kW kettle. How much has this cost at 18.2p per kWh?
How much water do you think was in the kettle?


I looked up the average unit charges for gas and electricity. According to the EST, the Energy Savings Trust, Gas is 3.80 p/kWh and a standing charge of £87.23, while electricity at standard rate is 14.37p/kWh and with an annual standing charge of £73.06. Using these averaged figures rather than the ones that apply in your house, look at these problems:

4. How much cheaper is gas than electricity?              [Subtraction? Division? Decide!]

5. Figures from OfGem suggest that typical annual consumption is 16500kWh of gas and 3300kWh of electricity. Using these figures, find the typical annual total for these fuels.
Using the figures you generated, compare the annual cost per unit of gas as a percentage of that for electricity. How does this compare with your answer to Q4?

6. Gas consumption figures as measured by Ofgem dropped by 500 units per year every year in the period 2003 to 2011. If this continues, what sort of figure would you say this represents as an annual change per household? Please comment.

7. Between 2003 and 2011 OfGem says gas consumption went from 20,500 units to 16,500 units, while electricity stayed at 3300 units. What £ change would you expect them to report?
The report I found shows figures for gas of £608 in 2003 and £729 in 2011. What do you conclude?

8. The reduction in gas consumption between 2003 and 2011 produced little change at the domestic level, but when multiplied across the nation what does that represent? Gas prices rose by 15% in the five years 2012 to 2017, quite a bit faster than inflation. I found a prediction that  prices will jump in 2018 and then rise more slowly. My interpretation suggests that the unit price 2018 will be 4.8p/unit and by 2023 5.2p/unit. If consumption continues at 16500, what do think the additional cost will be? You will probably need a table of results.


DJS 20180120

9. The general move  away fro fossil fuels means that we need to encouraged away from gas. You answer from Q4 shows that we have little incentive to do this. There is a campaign to persuade us to switch from gas to heat pumps, which are electrically powered but around four times as efficient compared to direct electrical heating. Does that make a switch worthwhile?

10. These heat pumps work by taking heat from the air or the ground. You need a lot of land to take it from the ground and although this might be shared land like a piece of park, generally it is appropriate for the already well-off. Air-sourced heat pumps require a couple of square metres of ground but can be a little noisy (but they are improving rapidly). However, a heat pump is doing very well to raise water temperatures to 50ºC and there's a practical upper limit of 60ºC.

You use heating energy for two purposes, (a) to heat water for washing and bathing and (b) to heat the volume of the house and the general modelling assumption is that this means central heating and radiators.

 (a) At what temperature do you set your hot water at home and what does a supply at 50ºC mean for you?

(b) At what temperature do you set your household radiators?  It's probably a different number to part (a). If instead that supply is at 50º, what are the consequences for your house heating?







1. Mostly standing charge, which is similar for both fuels, £84 per year for E and £73 for gas. The extra 4 or 4.1p of electricity.  26x84/73=> 29.9p Electricity standing charge.

2. Energy (J) = mass x 4184 J/º/kg x T change. A litre of water masses 1kg. So 0.5  x 4184 x 90º => 188280J = 188kJ.  188280/2000 = 94 secs.  Did I need half a litre in the kettle and if I did, was that how much I put in? If it takes more than two minutes, something needs to change. Most of us put far too much water in the kettle.

3. 3 kW x 70/3600 = 0.0583kWh => 0.0583 x 18.2 = 1.06 p.    1sf good.
3kW x 70secs=210kJ = 4184 x 90 x M => 0.558kg = 0.558 litres, 98% of a pint.   1sf preferred, Answer ought to be "a pint".  The timing may well go to the point at which the kettle switches off, which may be ( I tested this) 5 secs longer than with you listening to the kettle and switching it off yourself, so 10% error is quite likely. I did this for real using a pint, 67 secs to the point where the 3kW kettle switched itself off, which is a 5% measured difference.

4. 14.37/3.8 = 3.78  so nearly four times. Gas is 26% of the electricity price. If you want to include the standing charge, then you need to make some assumptions about annual total consumption, Q5.

5. (£87.23 + 16500 x 0.038) + (£73.06 + 3300 x 0.1437) = 714.23 + 547.27 = £1261.50 is the typical annual energy bill.
Gas £714.23/16500 = £0.0433,  electricity £547.27/3300 = 0.1658, gas/elec => 26.10% 4sf, 2sf correct is good. The standing charge has no noticeable effect. Basically, gas costs four times less per KWh. That explains why we use gas for heating, of course.

6. 500 kWh x £0.038 = £1.9 per year. Would people notice? As a money difference it probably disappears when compared with price changes. if people look at the kWh for their house, then you would notice that steady drop; in 2011 it was around 3% a year every year. 3% of the typical total energy cost is about £40; would many people notice? I doubt it, but what do you think? For this size of saving, would you actively spend so as to improve your insulation, or drop the thermostat temperature?

7. 4000 x 0.038 = £152. I conclude that the price of gas changed too by about 20%. The published figures were (2003) £608/16500 => 3.68p/kWh and (2011) £729/20500=.3.56p/unit. If we assume a standing charge that did not change of £73 (it would have to change a lot to make a difference to the result), the money numbers change to £535 and £656, so that the unit rate numbers become  3.24p and 3.2p.  Does that mean that gas went up in price after 2011, or perhaps that the EST 2017 number doesn’t agree with the OfGem 2011 number? Ofgem show a 15% rise in average standard price in the period 2012 to 2017, which would be equivalent to 3.3 to 3.8 pence per unit. The figures are pretty consistent.

8. 3% a year every year, as shown in Q6 answer.
Year     Demand    Rate    Extra Cost     
2017   16500          3.8      0
2018   16500          4.8      £165             
2019   16500          4.9      + £16.5
2020   16500          5.0     + 2x£16.5
2021   16500          5.1    + 3x£16.5
2022   16500          5.2    + 4x £16.5

Total additional cost £165 + 10x£16.50 = £330. Similar answers all acceptable, but see how I made it look easy — that’s maths not arithmetic.  The rise is about 2% a year once we get past the jump in 2018 (expected to be announced at the time of writing this!).

Those campaigning against the exploitation of shale for gas supply have not seen the predicted jump in gas price. Perhaps these are people for whom £200 extra a year is no big deal?

Perhaps instead we should be campaigning to not use gas at all? But to make that happen we would need for gas to be the same sort of price as electricity.

9. Your answer to Q4 said gas is four times less expensive than electricity, so a heat pump working at four times the efficiency of electrical heating ought to be a straight swap, like for like.

But of course that swap of systems has a cost, so you'd look at switching only if (i) you could see that the price of gas was going to go up and electricity go down and (ii) if the state was to subsidise, even pay for entirely, the conversion.

10. After many years I know I want the hot water at 65ºC, though I'll accept 60º. So heat pump hot water needs some more heating (electrical) before I want it leaving the storage tank. I also expect that water leaving the heat pump at 60º doesn't arrive at the tank quite as hot. As for (b), my boiler is sending water at 70º-75º off to the radiators so that by the time it has gone around the system the last radiator is struggling to warm a room in the depth of winter — and we have our house very cold compared to the national average. So this means that if the water starts of cooler then I need very much larger radiators to move heat into the house. What I really need to do is swap to underfloor heating and have very much better insulation standards. I can do that by moving house; I can do that by spending (a lot of) money on house improvement. But unless a future buyer recognises those improvements as worth paying for (so the value of the house goes up by at least the spend; generally house buyers don't value this) then I need to recover the cost in savings (of energy not bought). My calculations say that, unless the state pays for the conversion, I simply won't live long enough to recover those costs. So I return to the solution being moving house. That does nothing to change the older stock of housing in the nation; fixing the problem just for me is not fixing the right problem. It is not fixing the energy problem or the climate change problem it is simply moving my problem off to someone else. It would be better to contemplate removing a house and replacing it with something built to higher standards. You can imagine how that looks as a cost exercise; if you're interested, see if you can value your house as £ per square metre of floor (or usable floor, ignoring corridors) and then the value of the site with no house on it (or with a modern house on it). Juggle these to see the value of the site (as a location) and then imagine putting back the modern house in its place. The numbers are quite large and you soon have a feel for the value of a property or site where you'd consider demolishing before a rebuild. Most builders only do this if they can divide the site so that the housing density (people per hectare) goes up, usually by around five times.


why?  Email: David@Scoins.net      © David Scoins 2021